Patient selection and protocol adherence may improve stroke outcomes1-4
Be proactive
- Apply established standards of patient selection and follow proven treatment protocols
- Review eligibility criteria in specific patient populations
Click on the links below to view information about Activase use in specific types of stroke patients.
- Patient eligibility—elderly stroke patients
- Patient eligibility—severe stroke patients
- More eligible patients could benefit
- Protocol adherence improves stroke outcomes
Patient eligibility—elderly stroke patients
Activase (t-PA) may benefit older stroke patients5-7
- *
- Assessed by scores on modified Rankin scale (mRS) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale at hospital discharge. Percentages do not always total 100 because of rounding.6
The risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients >77 years of age may be increased and should be weighed against anticipated benefits.
- Age should not necessarily preclude Activase (t-PA) treatment in eligible patients. The potential benefits and risks in older patients are comparable with those achieved in younger patients5-7:
- †
- Represented by an mRS score of 0 to 1.
- ‡
- Represented by an mRS score of 0 to 5.
Patient eligibility—severe stroke patients
Activase (t-PA) may benefit severe stroke patients8,9
NIH = National Institutes of Health.
- §
- Possible range of NIH Stroke Scale scores = 0 to 42; a higher score reflects more severe disability.
- ∥
- Favorable outcome = modified Rankin scale score of 0 or 1.
Activase (t-PA)-treated patients presenting with severe neurologic deficit (eg, NIH Stroke Scale score >22) have an increased risk of symptomatic ICH within the first 36 hours.
At 1 year:
- Greater percentages of patients on Activase had favorable outcomes vs placebo, regardless of the severity of baseline NIH Stroke Scale scores (post-hoc analysis of the 6- and 12-month data from the NINDS trial)8
More eligible patients could benefit
FACT: 72% to 87% of eligible patients may go untreated despite the proven benefits of Activase (t-PA)10-12
Along with in-hospital stroke protocols, quality improvement (QI) programs are critical to delivering Activase (t-PA) to all eligible patients.
- Review all patient exclusions
- Evaluate hospital processes to streamline delays in patient assessment and evaluation
- Promote a better understanding of patient eligibility requirements
Studies about quality improvement and patient exclusion in the use of Activase (t-PA) in acute ischemic stroke:
Barber PA, Zhang J, Demchuk AM, et al. Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? Neurology. 2001;56:1015-1020.
Deng YZ, Reeves MJ, Jacobs BS, et al. IV tissue plasminogen activator use in acute stroke. Neurology. 2006;66:306-312.
Cocho D, Belvís R, Martí-Fàbregas J, et al. Reasons for exclusion from thrombolytic therapy following acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;64:719-720.
Protocol adherence improves stroke outcomes
Quality improvement led to decreased protocol violations, improved safety, and increased Activase (t-PA) usage2
Adapted from Katzan IL, et al. Stroke. 2003;34:799-800.
- ¶
- One tertiary care center and 8 community hospitals.
- #
- Protocol deviations included: (1) treatment beyond 3 hours (n=7), anticoagulation within 24 hours (n=1), and deviations from blood pressure guidelines (n=3).
- **
- t-PA administration among all admitted ischemic stroke patients.
After implementing a quality improvement (QI) program to enhance stroke outcomes, the Cleveland Clinic Health System found evidence of improved outcomes2:
- Rate of protocol deviations lowered from 33% to 17%
- Rate of symptomatic ICH lowered from 13.4% to 6.4%
- Increase from 1.8% to 2.7% in rate of Activase (t-PA) use among all admitted patients with ischemic stroke

