In acute ischemic stroke...NINDS* pivotal study shows
Patients treated with Activase were 30% more likely to have minimal to no disability at 3 months vs placebo†
The efficacy profile of Activase was established in the pivotal National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) study1

- *
- Activase=144; placebo=147.
- †
- Defined as a 4-point improvement in the NIHSS score from baseline values or complete resolution of the neurologic deficit.
- ‡
- Activase=168; placebo=165.
- §
- According to scores on the Barthel Index, the Modified Rankin Scale, the Glasgow Outcome Scale, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.1
- ||
- Based on a Modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 (minimal or no disability).
- Reference: 1. NINDS. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581-1587.
The efficacy profile of Activase was established in the pivotal National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) study (NINDS 1995)
- The NINDS study was carried out in 2 parts: Part 1 (N=291) assessed changes in neurologic deficits 24 hours after the onset of stroke, whereas part 2 (the pivotal study; N=333) assessed clinical outcomes at 3 months, according to scores on the Barthel Index, the Modified Rankin Scale, the Glasgow Outcome Scale, and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale1
- The favorable outcome is defined as a Modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 (minimal or no disability)
- – In Part 2, 39% of patients treated with Activase experienced favorable outcomes, compared with 26% of patients in the placebo group (P=0.019)
- – 6.4% of patients treated with Activase experienced symptomatic intracerebral hemmorrhage (SICH), compared with 0.6% of patients in the placebo group (P<0.001)
- – 17% of patients treated with Activase died, compared with 21% in the placebo group. This was not a statistically significant difference (P=0.30)

- *
- NINDS=National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Favorable outcome=Barthel, 95 or 100; Modified Rankin, 0 or 1; Glasgow, 1; NIHSS, <1.
P value is based on a global scale.
Part 2 of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (N=333) conducted by NINDS of patients at 3 months after being treated for ischemic stroke with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (n=168) or placebo (n=165) within 3 hours of onset.
- †
- A global test statistic was used to assess clinical outcome, according to the Barthel Index, Modified Rankin Scale, Glasgow Outcome Scale, and NIHSS. Part 1 of the study (n=291) tested results within 24 hours of stroke onset.

- 1
- Within trial follow-up period. Symptomatic ICH was defined as the occurrence of sudden clinical worsening followed by subsequent verification of ICH on CT scan. Asymptomatic ICH was defined as ICH detected on a routine repeat CT scan without preceding clinical worsening.
- 2
- Fisher's Exact Test
NINDS study design:
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rt-PA Stroke Study was a randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled study of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous
recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) or placebo.
The NINDS trial was conducted in two parts.
The primary endpoint in Part 1 (N=291) was a demonstration of clinical activity in the Activase group,
as defined by an improvement of 4 points over baseline values in the score of the National
Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) or the resolution of the neurologic deficit within
24 hours of the onset of stroke. This endpoint was not met; no significant difference in outcome
was seen between groups at 24 hours. The endpoint in Part 2 (N=333) was a global test statistic to
assess clinical outcome at three months, according to scores on the Barthel Index (BI),
Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and NIHSS. In Part 2, the endpoint was
confirmed (global odds ratio for a favorable outcome, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6).
- Outcomes reflect data reported in Figure 2 of Part 2 of the NINDS study, applied to this hypothetical patient population1
- Assignment to disability levels is based on average percentage per group on all 4 assessment scales (NIHSS, Barthel Index, Modified Rankin Scale, and Glasgow Outcome Scale)
This hypothetical representation of 16 patients treated with Activase (t-PA) vs 16 patients treated with placebo is based on NINDS results at 3 months.1
In this illustration, 1 of the mortalities in the Activase (t-PA) group could be due to SICH.
Patients treated with Activase (t-PA)
Patients treated with placebo
Patients with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH)†
In NINDS, when eligible patients were treated with Activase (t-PA) compared with placebo1:
- More ischemic stroke patients sustained minimal to no disability (31% vs 20%†)
- Fewer had moderate-to-severe disability (52% vs 59%†)
- There was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality (17% vs 21%; P=0.30)
- The rate of SICH among patients treated with Activase (t-PA) was 6.4% vs 0.6% with placebo (P<0.001) at 36 hours
- – Approximately half of the patients experiencing SICH had nonfatal outcomes at 36 hours
- – 55% (11 of 20) of patients treated with Activase (t-PA) and 50% (1 of 2) of patients given a placebo
- *
- Defined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score compared to baseline.
- †
- Based on NIHSS score comparison; trend consistent across remaining 3 outcome scales.
Why choose to reperfuse?
- Activase (t-PA) may help reverse neurologic impairment*
- More acute ischemic stroke patients recover with minimal or no disability at 3 months and 1 year4,5
* Defined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score compared to baseline.
- 11% to 13% absolute increase in favorable outcomes for
Activase (t-PA) at 3 months vs placebo1- – There was an 11% absolute (55% relative) increase in the number of patients receiving
Activase (t-PA) with an NIHSS score of 0 or 1; a 12% absolute (32% relative) increase in the number of patients with minimal or no disability based on a score of 95 or 100 on the Barthel Index; and 13% absolute increases in the numbers of patients with favorable outcomes based on the Modified Rankin and Glasgow Outcome Scales, all vs placebo
- – There was an 11% absolute (55% relative) increase in the number of patients receiving
- Treatment is not recommended after 3 hours of acute ischemic stroke symptom onset or in patients with minor neurologic deficit or with rapidly improving symptoms

Adapted from Kwiatkowski TG et al. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1781.
Note: NIHSS scores were unavailable at 6 and 12 months because follow-up assessments were conducted by telephone.
Favorable outcome=Barthel, 95 or 100; Modified Rankin, 0 or 1; Glasgow, 1.
A 1-year follow-up study of outcome data for the 624 patients enrolled in the original 2-part NINDS study, using intent-to-treat analysis (26 patients missing at 12-month assessment considered to have unfavorable outcomes). There were 312 patients in each group, those treated for ischemic stroke with t-PA.
A favorable outcome was defined as minimal or no disability as measured by the Barthel Index, the Modified Rankin Scale, and the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
- 11% to 13% absolute increase in neurologic recovery for Activase (t-PA) at 1 year vs placebo2
- – There was a 12% absolute (32% relative) increase in the number of patients receiving Activase (t-PA) with minimal or no disability based on a score of 95 or 100 on the Barthel Index; a 13% absolute (46% relative) increase in the number with minimal or no disability based on a score of 0 or 1 on the Modified Rankin Scale; and an 11% absolute (34% relative) increase in the number with minimal or no disability based on a score of 1 on the Glasgow Outcome Scale
Independent reviews support findings from NINDS
Follow-up analyses demonstrated that original NINDS study outcomes were not biased by baseline imbalances (eg, NIHSS score, severity, age), a previous misconception4,5
- After consideration of baseline imbalances, favorable outcomes were more likely in patients treated with Activase (t-PA) in original trials at 3 months (OR 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5–2.9)4

